Performance Issues

[portofleith]

Guestting has posted that Ears had some performance issues at times. Read the 2nd to last paragraph of this article:

i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm241/portofleith-2008/copycat.jpg

So, like Goleta, some of Ears attacks did not result in rape. Was this performance failure only with the youngest of victims - anyone know? I wonder if the cases where he was unable to perform were related to victims not following the script?

[nightdriver]

Oh God, what a joke. "concerned about their safety."

Only since about 2005, moron.

"I go there every morning, I have the number 13 breakfast." I got the message.

Right now, YOU seem to be the only one on here to be concerned about.

Go ahead, send me some more of your filth. I need a few good laughs.

You didn't bite last night, I was "around."

Bottom line: You're a stumblebum. Or are you?

[nightdriver]

Port, lets get back to basics. That is interesting that successive attacks, one in College Greens and one in Foothill Farms were not successful.

Also from another article that you put up, it stated that two of the first ten attacks were not successful.

I believe there is also a question if the teenyboppers were actually raped. And I believe the babysitter may not have been either.

Some questions might be something like "What was the victimology sequence?" And "What really did happen at the attacks?" Remember, he had to do Davis II before they ever figured out that he had done Davis I. As far as I know, Davis I was his most violent attack. Pretty serious.

[portofleith]

Nightdriver,

I have never looked at the sequence of victim's in terms of age/rape vs no-rape, but that could be interesting. I believe the Davis attack resulted in at least a broken nose. A long time ago I posted an excerpt from a paper about rape that stated that one Ears victim was actually able to take Ears gun away from him but she hesitated to use it. His blood was left on another victim in a knife struggle. Everything I have read prior to ONS has led me to believe that cooperating victims were not physically harmed. Now I have second thoughts about that.I only know what I have read in newspapers and articles like Sac Mag. Was there physical violence at all attacks(besides the rape itself)? I am not being dumb here- I just want to know when the violence began to escalate? Port

[nightdriver]

I'll have to dig out the article on Davis I, she had three injuries.

I had thought that the blood came from the time the victim grabbed the gun and he cut himself with his knife recovering the piece.

I do not think there was violence at all attacks. We don't have the real total. 17 and under? Probably not. But Davis I was NOT the only violent attack.

Oh, and no violence that I am aware of in Davis II and III. Nor in the Stockton cases.

But that would depend.... There's the one story about him getting ticked off and stabbing the victim's mattress several times. This was not a stable dude, how he never made a fatal mistake, I'll never know.

[guessting]

In the 70's Cocaine was a drug used frequently and some individuals had difficulty getting and maintain an erection.